Advances in intensive copepod production technology

M. Dean Kline Chatham K. Callan, Ph.D. Charles W. Laidley, Ph.D.

Oceanic Institute aims to overcome finfish hatchery bottlenecks

copepod
These light micrographs of Parvocalanus crassirostris show an adult female (left) and a typically smaller adult male.

The expansion of the marine aquaculture industry is currently limited, in part, by the inability to successfully bring large numbers of larvae through the critical first-feeding stage. Currently, a program at the Finfish Department of the Oceanic Institute is addressing this challenge by developing methods to culture fish with extremely small larvae that cannot be reared using conventional rotifer- and artemia-based hatchery methods. Included in this group are snappers, groupers and many coral reef species.

Previous projects at the Oceanic Institute were successful in overcoming bottlenecks associated with rearing these small-mouthed larvae by finding a suitable first feed, which ultimately allowed the facility to rear several new species, including the bluefin trevally, an important sport fish in Hawaii; the flame angelfish, a highly valued species in the marine ornamental trade; and the Gulf of Mexico red snapper, a key Gulf species.

The authors achieved this success through the identification of a local calanoid copepod species (P. crassirostris) that has very small and nutritious nauplii.

Calanoid copepods

In addition to facilitating the culture of highly challenging species, the copepods offer several advantages over traditional rotifer and artemia-based technologies. Copepods are thought to be the natural feed source for the larval stages of many fish species. They can be obtained locally, avoiding the use of non-native or invasive species. In addition, their nutritional profile is superior to that of either rotifers or artemia.

However, intensive-production technology for copepods is relatively new and, although successful at smaller scales, required significant development to allow broader application and commercial scale up. Over the past few years, the authors’ work with P. crassirostris focused on refining methods for intensive, pilot-scale production of nauplii with the goal of demonstrating its potential for commercial application.

P. crassirostris potential

Cultures of P. crassirostris originally isolated locally from Kaneohe Bay in Oahu, Hawaii, USA, have been maintained at the Oceanic Institute since 2004. Eggs hatch within seven hours at 25 degrees-C into stage 1 nauplii that are 49 µ wide and 77 µ long, which then take approximately eight days to mature to adulthood at the same temperature. Females are 420 µ long and visually distinct from the smaller 310-µ-long males, both in overall body shape and length of first antennae.

Females produce eggs in clutches of four with healthy females producing up to 28 eggs/day. Females are reproductive throughout their lives, although peak output is generally observed in younger females. The female lifespan can extend to 28 days after hatching. Male P. crassirostris, with no observable mouth parts, generally die within a week of maturing to the adult stage.

Small-scale trial

Early work on P. crassirostris focused on parameters necessary for successful maintenance of stock cultures. The copepods were found to be euryhaline and eurythermal, although cultures are generally maintained in 22 ppt water at 25 degrees-C. Photoperiod studies revealed a wide tolerance to lighting regimens. P. crassirostris are cultured under continuous light from overhead fluorescent fixtures to allow concurrent in situ algae growth.

Algal diets were evaluated in relation to maturation, survival and adult reproduction. Tetraselmis species, Nannochloropsis species, Isochrysis galbana and Chaetoceros muelleri were tested singularly and as combination diets.

Survival to the adult stage increased when nauplii were fed a diet including I. galbana, whereas female fecundity increased with a diet of C. muelleri. Neither Tetraselmis nor Nannochloropsis, either singularly or as mixed diets, led to any noticeable increase in maturation, survival or female reproduction. Therefore, cultures of P. crassirostris are currently maintained on a diet consisting of 150,000 cells/mL of each of the algae I. galbana and C. mulleri.

The authors then focused on nauplii production as a function of population dynamics. In particular, extensive research investigated the relationship between adult copepod density and female fecundity for the purpose of maximizing nauplii production to meet the requirements of a marine fish hatchery.

As has been noted in a wide variety of other copepod species, P. crassirostris reduces reproductive output when population density increases. Although algae density, water quality and cannibalism of young were investigated, only daily harvest and removal of nauplii from culture alleviated density effects on female fecundity in the range of adult densities tested.

nauplii
Each nauplii production unit is comprised of a 1,500-L production tank (top left) and 200-L egg and nauplii harvest tank (lower right). Culture water containing eggs, nauplii and algae passively drains into a harvest bucket submerged in the harvest tank.

Large-scale development

A large-scale nauplii production system was designed and constructed based on the results of earlier small-scale trials. The system consisted of four conical-bottom, 1,500-liter tanks with seven 1,000-liter tanks used for maturation of nauplii to the adult stage.

Each nauplii tank was harvested daily by passive flow through a 105-µ banjo filter into a 20-liter harvest bucket with 38-µ screen panels to retain eggs and nauplii but allow the flow of culture water out of the harvest bucket. Water was then pumped back into the main nauplii production tank at 30 L/minute to complete the circuit. Ninety-five percent of nauplii and eggs can be removed from the production tank with little effort in four hours.

Every day, eggs and nauplii from the harvest are stocked into a clean maturation tank at 20/mL, while a maturation tank is harvested for adults to stock into the nauplii production tank to maintain female densities of 1-2/mL. In addition, each nauplii production and adult maturation tank receives 150,000 cells/mL of both I. galbana and C. mulleri, resulting in a daily need of 1.95 trillion cells of each alga for the entire system, which are produced on site in the algae production laboratory.

Harvest figures recorded over 36 days for eggs and nauplii from four nauplii production tanks are shown in Fig. 1. Daily harvests ranged from 36 million to 135 million eggs and nauplii, with an average of 83 million eggs and nauplii.

The greatest variation in harvest yield was due to algae culture shortages, which led to subsequent nauplii production declines in the system. The inadequate supply of algae for the nauplii production tanks resulted in an immediate reduction in eggs and nauplii produced.

Normal production values returned after several days of properly sustained feed densities. However, if algae production could not be stabilized, a subsequent lack of algae for the maturation tanks led to a reduction in the quantity of adults used to replace deceased females in nauplii production tanks. Having fewer females further reduced egg and nauplii harvests.

harvest
Fig. 1: Total daily harvest abundance of eggs and nauplii from four nauplii production tanks.

Perspectives

Future research on copepod production at the Oceanic Institute will focus on further refinement of the intensive nauplii production system – given the promising preliminary data showing more than 100 million eggs and nauplii harvested daily. Specifically, it would be desirable to develop more efficient algae culture methods or, ideally, an appropriate live microalgae substitute.

Although this system shows exciting potential for supplying large numbers of copepod nauplii, the expense of maintain-
ing and operating an algae production facility to support it represents a large portion of the total cost. Therefore, future efforts will continue to address these important challenges.

(Editor’s Note: This article was originally published in the January/February 2014 print edition of the Global Aquaculture Advocate.)