Deprecated: Creation of dynamic property QM_DB::$categories is deprecated in /home/gsa-1A5mB/debug.globalseafood.org/public/wp-includes/wp-db.php on line 760

Deprecated: Creation of dynamic property QM_DB::$post2cat is deprecated in /home/gsa-1A5mB/debug.globalseafood.org/public/wp-includes/wp-db.php on line 760

Deprecated: Creation of dynamic property QM_DB::$link2cat is deprecated in /home/gsa-1A5mB/debug.globalseafood.org/public/wp-includes/wp-db.php on line 760
Advances in shrimp postlarval nutrition - Responsible Seafood Advocate

Advances in shrimp postlarval nutrition

Patrick Lavens, Ph.D. Patrick Sorgeloos, Ph.D.

Proper postlarval nutrition, controlling microflora lead to higher quality hatchery output

postlarval nutrition
Artemia is still the most important live food for shrimp postlarvae.

Shrimp postlarvae quality significantly contributes to higher and more sustainable shrimp production. A variety of factors – including nutrition, treatment of disease, and control of microflora – contribute to seedstock health in optimal hatchery operations.

Direct nutritional effects on postlarval quality

The nutritional value of artemia spp. nauplii, still the major food organism used for culturing shrimp postlarvae (PL), is highly variable depending on geographic origin, especially in their content of the essential fatty acid eicosapentaenoic acid 20:5 omega-3 (EPA). However, the biochemical composition of artemia can easily be manipulated through the bioencapsulation technique using emulsified marine oils containing high levels of EPA and DHA (docosahexaenoic acid 22:6 omega-3).

Lavens, Mortality rates of P. monodon postlarvae, Table 1

Postlarval StageSalinity Stress
Condition
Mortality 24 h After Challenge (%)
Low-HUFA Diet
Mortality 24 h After Challenge (%)
Medium-HUFA Diet
Mortality 24 h After Challenge (%)
High-HUFA Diet
Reference
PL101 h at 7 g/l82a (6)15b (5)Tackaert et al., 1992
PL102 h at 10 g/l75a (2)35b (15)10c (2)Rees et al., 1994
PL151 h at 10 g/l73a (7)13b (4)Kontara et al., 1995a
Table 1. Mortality rates of P. monodon postlarvae, fed artemia nauplii enriched with different levels of HUFA, after an osmotic stress test.

 

HUFA-enriched artemia

Several authors have reported that feeding highly unsaturated fatty acid (HUFA)-enriched artemia to Penaeus monodon PLs resulted in improved PL quality, expressed as their ability to survive an exposure to a salinity shock (Table 1). Other research has documented that very high dietary levels of 31 milligrams per gram DW HUFA (DHA/EPA ratio of 0.5) did not improve postlarval stress resistance, suggesting that an excessive supply of HUFA may not be beneficial to the shrimp.

Phosphatidyl choline

shrimp postlarval nutrition
Fig. 1: Effect of soybean lecithin (PC) supplementation on stress sensitivity of postlarval shrimp. a: Litopenaeus vannamei (data from Coutteau et al, 1999a, b); B: Penaeus japonicus (data from Camara et al., 1997; Kontara et al., 1997a, 1998).

Other lipid components, such as phosphatidyl choline (PC), may have similar effects on P. japonicus and Litopenaeus vannamei PLs. For both species, 1.5 percent inclusion of soybean PC in the diet resulted in a significant increase in stress resistance, expressed as mortality after exposure for increased time intervals to deionized water (Fig. 1).

Vitamins

Vitamins may also play an important role in improving the quality of hatchery-produced PLs. Culture tests with vitamin C-boosted microbound diets for P. monodon and L. vannamei PLs confirmed the hypothesis that dietary ascorbic acid (AA) improved overall physiological condition in postlarvae (Table 2).

Optimal resistance to a Vibrio harveyi infection was observed when L. vannamei PLs were fed a megadose (2,000 mg AA equivalent per kilogram) of vitamin C (Fig. 2). An increase from 230 to 810 milligrams per kilogram in astaxanthin levels in the diet of P. monodon also resulted in a significant drop of the stress index (cumulative mortality index during an osmotic shock from 56 to 33).

Lavens, Mortality rates of shrimp postlarvae fed microbound diets, Table 2

Postlarval StageSalinity Stress
Condition
Mortality 24 h After Challenge (%)
0 mg/kg VitC* in Diet
Mortality 24 h After Challenge (%)
100 mg/kg VitC* in Diet
Mortality 24 h After Challenge (%)
2000 mg/kg VitC* in Diet
Reference
L. vannamei, PL401 h at 0 g/l67a (10)37b (6)10c (8)Kontara et al. 1997
L. vannamei, PL361 h at 8 g/l95a (1)95a (1)94a (1)Lavens et al., 1998
P. monodon, PL402 h at 0 g/l83a (2)56b (7)Merchie et al., 1998
P. monodon, PL251 h at 0 g/l91a (3)91a (4)94b (4)Lavens et al., unpubl.
* Expressed as ascorbic acid equivalents.
Values within the same row with the same superscript are not significant different (P>0.05); n = 3.


Table 2. Mortality rates of shrimp postlarvae fed microbound diets with different levels of vitamin C, after challenge to an osmotic stress test.

Effect of immunostimulants on postlarval quality

Immunostimulants have gained interest as a valuable alternative to antibiotics and vaccines in the fight against infectious diseases in shrimp farming. A number of commercial products (yeast preparations, beta-glucans, polysaccharides) are now available, all claiming to have positive effects on disease resistance. Recent experiments run with specific immunostimulants are referenced below.

Commercial booster diet

shrimp postlarval nutrition
Fig. 2: Cumulative mortality of L. vannamei PL fed microbound diets containing 0 (AA 0), 100 (AA 100), and 2000 (AA 2000) mg/kg equivalents of ascorbic acid, as a result of an infection with Vibrio harveyi from two weeks of rearing onwards (modified from Kontara et al., 1997b).

A commercial booster (Dry Immune Selco®; DIS, Inve Aquaculture NV), containing a mix of immunostimulants and vitamins C and E, was developed for bioencapsulation in artemia. P. monodon PL11 were fed non-enriched (control) or DIS-enriched artemia for five days. Twenty-four hours after the start of the experiment, the DIS group suffered significantly lower mortality (20 percent vs. 90 percent) than the control group when the animals were submitted to a salinity stress test (1 hr at 0 ppt). Similar results were reported for P. indicus PL16.

Microparticulate diet

A microparticulate diet (Stresspak, Inve) containing high levels of selected micronutrients in combination with immunostimulants was developed as a partial replacement for live food, to fortify shrimp PLs during transportation and just after stocking in ponds. Handling conditions at these times are considered very stressful and may normally result in a substantial PL mortality. A 50 percent supplementation of this diet for 14 days from PL1 stage onwards resulted in 30 percent higher survival after subsequent 12-h transportation to the nursery.

Better control of microflora during hatchery rearing

The live food used in larviculture operations is an important source of microbial contamination. For example, artemia nauplii are heavily contaminated with bacteria of more than 107 colony forming units (CFU) per gram, mostly Vibrio spp. These bacteria may be potentially pathogenic, or may stress the shrimp PL and make them more susceptible to viral infections.

Several reports have shown that disinfection – and even decapsulation – of the cysts prior to hatching incubation does not prevent bacteria from developing during the final hours before harvesting of the nauplii. Furthermore, thorough washing of the hatched nauplii does not have a significant effect on microbial contamination levels.

Reducing bacterial numbers

shrimp postlarval nutrition
Fig. 3: Microscopic views of artemia cyst surfaces 24 h after incubation. a, control: presence of filamentous bacteria, protozoa, etc. b, DC artemia cysts: clean cyst surface (from Merchie et al., 1997)

Application of the recently commercialized DC Artemia cysts® (Inve) resulted in a drastic reduction of bacterial numbers in hatching water all the way through the hatching incubation of the cysts. At harvest of the nauplii, bacterial levels reached 107 CFU per milliliter (total counts, use of Marine Agar: M.A.) in control tanks versus 103 CFU per milliliter in the DC treatment. Vibrio levels (specific counts, Thiosulphate-Citrate- Bile-Sucrose agar: TCBS) were 106 CFU per milliliter versus 102 CFU per milliliter .

A comparable pattern was observed with regard to bacterial load of the nauplii itself. Nauplii hatched out of DC cysts contained 10,000 times less bacteria (both on MA and TCBS) than the control. Microscopic examination of the cysts 24 hours after incubation revealed the presence of filamentous bacteria, protozoa, and other epizoics on the cyst surface of the control group only (Fig. 3). Similarly, after 24-hour enrichment of the nauplii with Selco® versus DC Selco® (Inve), bacterial contamination levels were 108, 105 CFU per milliliter for total counts, and 108 and 104 CFU per milliliter for Vibrio.

Optimizing control over microflora

Control over microflora in a shrimp hatchery can be further optimized through improved hygiene and the use of modular units that strictly separate hatchery sections. The adoption of regular shutdowns and sterilization periods between production cycles, use of probiotics, and minimal use of antibiotics are also effective measures.

Antibiotics

In recent years, several hatchery operators (especially in Latin America) have been inoculating larviculture tanks with selected Vibrio species with so-called probiotic effects. This empirical development certainly has great potential, but a more thorough scientific approach is required to develop well-documented and effective methods for microbial management in larviculture systems.

The use of antibiotics should be disapproved, certainly for prophylactic, but even for therapeutic treatment. In the latter case, it should be restricted to oral treatment only – through the application of the bioencapsulation technique with artemia, for example.

Conclusion

Research continues to improve larval shrimp diets through better dietary regimes, use of immunostimulants, and better control of microflora. These improve the production of predictable supplies of high-quality seedstock to support shrimp farming activities.

Note: Cited references available on request from the authors.

(Editor’s Note: This article was originally published in the December 2000 print edition of the Global Aquaculture Advocate.)

Now that you've finished reading the article ...

… we  hope you’ll consider supporting our mission to document the evolution of the global aquaculture industry and share our vast network of contributors’ expansive knowledge every week.

By becoming a Global Seafood Alliance member, you’re ensuring that all of the pre-competitive work we do through member benefits, resources and events can continue. Individual membership costs just $50 a year. GSA individual and corporate members receive complimentary access to a series of GOAL virtual events beginning in April. Join now.

Not a GSA member? Join us.

Support GSA and Become a Member