Deprecated: Creation of dynamic property QM_DB::$categories is deprecated in /home/gsa-1A5mB/debug.globalseafood.org/public/wp-includes/wp-db.php on line 760

Deprecated: Creation of dynamic property QM_DB::$post2cat is deprecated in /home/gsa-1A5mB/debug.globalseafood.org/public/wp-includes/wp-db.php on line 760

Deprecated: Creation of dynamic property QM_DB::$link2cat is deprecated in /home/gsa-1A5mB/debug.globalseafood.org/public/wp-includes/wp-db.php on line 760
Genetic response to selection in channel catfish - Responsible Seafood Advocate

Genetic response to selection in channel catfish

Brian C. Peterson, Ph.D. Brian G. Bosworth, Ph.D. Brian C. Small, Ph.D.

Line selected for increased growth, fillet yield, resistance to enteric septicemia

channel catfish
Channel catfish derived from the USDA104 line.

The United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) 103 line of channel catfish was developed jointly between the USDA Agricultural Research Service Catfish Genetics Research Unit in Stoneville, Mississippi, and the Mississippi Agricultural and Forestry Experiment Station at the Thad Cochran National Warmwater Aquaculture Center in Stoneville to improve economically important traits and benefit the U.S. catfish-farming industry.

Released to the industry as the NWAC103 line in 2000, the superior-growing USDA103 line has since been further selected for increased growth, as well as fillet yield and resistance to enteric septicemia of catfish (ESC). After two successive generations of family selection, the USDA303 experimental line resulted.

Ongoing studies

Using a recirculating aquarium rack system with 23-l tanks in 2006, Dr. Brian Small reported a 21.0 percent improvement in growth of the USDA303 strain over the USDA103 strain of catfish, while feed efficiency was similar for the two. Using 110-l flow-through aquariums, Dr. Menghe Li and fellow researchers in 2006 found a marginal 5.1 percent improvement in final weight and 3.3 percent greater feed efficiency for the USDA303 strain.

Using 76-l flow-through aquariums in 2008, the main author found no significant improvement in weight gain or feed efficiency in a growth study comparing the two lines. Environmental interactions and within-strain variations may be causes of these contradictory results.

In aquarium challenge models, improved resistance to Edwardsiella ictaluri, the bacterium that causes ESC, was reported in 2007 by A. Lelania Bilodeau and fellow researchers for the USDA303 strain compared to the USDA103 strain. Conversely, fillet yield studies have not shown significant differences in fillet yield between these two strains. The apparent improvements in growth and resistance to ESC need to be further evaluated in a pond environment.

Evaluation for desired traits

As part of the selective-breeding program at the Thad Cochran National Warmwater Aquaculture Center, the authors recently obtained spawning channel catfish at various farms across the Mississippi Delta to compare the growth, fillet yield and resistance to E. ictaluri challenge of the fish to other catfish strains, including the USDA103 line. Strains of fish that are superior in one or more traits may be viable to cross with the USDA103 line of catfish.

The authors have also further selected the USDA303 line for improved growth, fillet yield and resistance to ESC, resulting in the USDA403 experimental line. In addition, they have developed a fast-growing line of catfish by selecting the USDA303 catfish exclusively for weight gain. These fish will also be evaluated for feed efficiency and susceptibility to disease.

Current research

Recent research at the Thad Cochran National Warmwater Aquaculture Center compared the growth performance and body composition of the USDA103 line, the USDA403 line, a fast-growing line selected exclusively for increased fingerling weight gain in aquariums and an industry pool group of channel catfish collected from three farms. Fish were fed once a day to apparent satiation for eight weeks. At the end of the study, fish were weighed and sampled for whole body composition.

At four weeks, feed intake and weight gain were highest in the fast-growing line, followed by the USDA403, USDA103 and industry pool groups. By eight weeks, feed consumption and weight gain were still highest in the fast-growing line of fish (Table 1). Feed conversion was lower in the fast-growing fish compared to the USDA103 line.

Peterson, Performance of four genetically different groups of channel catfish, Table 1

StrainWeight Gain (g)Feed Intake (g)Feed-Conversion RatioCondition Factor
Fast growth47.5a57.2a1.21a.79a
USDA40335.0a44.0b1.26ab.74b
USDA10333.1b42.9b1.30b.76b
Industry pool22.5c27.8c1.24ab.69c
Standard pooled error0.840.810.010.01
Table 1. Performance of four genetically different groups of channel catfish. Values with different letters within columns are significantly different (P < 0.05).

The fast-growing, USDA103 and USDA403 lines had higher condition factors and protein efficiency ratios than the industry pool fish. There were no differences in whole body proximate composition and nitrogen retention among the lines of fish.

Selected strains superior

The study demonstrated the superiority in growth of the USDA lines of catfish compared to fish collected from catfish farms throughout the Mississippi Delta. The lower protein efficiency ratio in the latter group of fish also suggested they were not as efficient in converting dietary protein into weight gain.

The industry pool fish will need to be evaluated for other production traits, such as disease resistance, reproductive performance and fillet yield. If these fish are superior in one or more of these traits, they may be viable to cross with the USDA103 lines of catfish.

(Editor’s Note: This article was originally published in the May/June 2009 print edition of the Global Aquaculture Advocate.)

Now that you've finished reading the article ...

… we  hope you’ll consider supporting our mission to document the evolution of the global aquaculture industry and share our vast network of contributors’ expansive knowledge every week.

By becoming a Global Seafood Alliance member, you’re ensuring that all of the pre-competitive work we do through member benefits, resources and events can continue. Individual membership costs just $50 a year. GSA individual and corporate members receive complimentary access to a series of GOAL virtual events beginning in April. Join now.

Not a GSA member? Join us.

Support GSA and Become a Member